Flight Compensation Laws Worldwide: Which Regulation Applies to Your Flight?

Introduction: Why Flight Compensation Laws Are So Confusing

Flight disruptions are a global problem. Delays, cancellations, missed connections, overbooking, aircraft changes, crew shortages, and operational failures affect millions of passengers every year. Yet most travelers do not know that flight compensation rules are not universal.

Your right to compensation depends on which regulation applies to your flight, not on what the airline claims. Airlines frequently rely on passenger confusion to deny valid claims, especially when more than one legal framework may apply.

This guide explains all major flight compensation laws worldwide, how they work, when airlines must pay, and why professional legal handling dramatically increases success rates.

What Is Flight Compensation?

Flight compensation is a monetary payment passengers may be legally entitled to when a flight disruption occurs due to the airline’s responsibility.

Compensation may apply in cases of:

• Flight delays (usually 3 hours or more)

• Flight cancellations

• Missed connecting flights

• Denied boarding due to overbooking

• Involuntary rebooking

• Schedule changes

• Aircraft or crew-related disruptions

Unlike refunds, compensation is not linked to ticket price and is designed to compensate passengers for time loss, inconvenience, stress, and financial damage.

If your flight was delayed, cancelled, or disrupted — claim your compensation with professionals.

Check compensation

Why Different Laws Apply to Different Flights

There is no single global compensation rule. Instead, airlines are subject to:

• Regional regulations

• National passenger protection laws

• International treaties

Which law applies depends on:

• Departure airport

• Arrival airport

• Airline nationality

• Ticket structure (single booking vs separate tickets)

• Type of disruption

• Cause of the disruption

Airlines often apply the most restrictive interpretation, not the correct one.

Fixed Compensation vs Damage-Based Compensation

All flight compensation laws fall into two legal categories:

1️⃣ Fixed Compensation Regulations

Passengers receive a predefined amount, regardless of actual loss.

2️⃣ Damage-Based Liability Systems

Passengers may claim compensation based on provable material and non-material damage.

Understanding this distinction is critical, especially for non-EU flights.

EU Regulation 261/2004 (EU261)

Applies when:

• The flight departs from the EU, OR

• The flight arrives in the EU and is operated by an EU airline

Covers:

• Delays over 3 hours

• Cancellations

• Missed connections

• Overbooking / denied boarding

Compensation amounts:

• €250 (up to 1,500 km)

• €400 (1,500–3,500 km)

• €600 (over 3,500 km)

EU261 is the most well-known regulation, but airlines frequently misuse “extraordinary circumstances” to avoid payment.

UK261 (Post-Brexit)

UK261 mirrors EU261 but applies to:

• Flights departing from the UK

• Flights arriving in the UK with UK or EU airlines

Compensation levels remain identical to EU261, paid in GBP equivalents.

Montreal Convention – Article 19 (Global Standard)

The Montreal Convention governs international flights worldwide and applies when EU261 or UK261 do not.

Key difference:

There is no fixed compensation amount.

Instead, airlines are liable for delay-related damage, including:

• Missed business meetings

• Lost working days

• Additional accommodation costs

• Stress and physical exhaustion

• Professional and financial loss

• Disrupted travel plans

This makes Article 19 especially powerful for:

• Non-EU flights

• Long-haul routes

• Intercontinental connections

• Complex itineraries

Airlines rarely inform passengers about these rights.

National Passenger Protection Laws

Some countries apply their own compensation regimes, which may include fixed payouts.

Examples include:

• Canada (APPR)

• Israel Aviation Services Law

• Turkey (SHY Passenger Rights)

• Brazil (ANAC Resolution 400)

• Saudi Arabia (GACA regulations)

Each has specific eligibility rules, compensation caps, and airline obligations.

Why Airlines Often Refuse Compensation

Airlines rely on:

• Automated refusals

• Misclassification of disruption causes

• Incorrect application of regulations

• Jurisdictional confusion

• Passenger fatigue

Many refusals are legally incorrect, especially in Montreal Convention cases.

Why Claiming Alone Often Fails

Passengers who file claims themselves often face:

• Generic denial emails

• Months of silence

• Requests for unnecessary documents

• Pressure to accept vouchers or miles

Airlines know that most passengers give up.

How MySkyHelp Increases Success Rates

MySkyHelp applies:

• Regulation hierarchy analysis

• Airline liability assessment

• Strategic selection between fixed compensation and damage-based claims

• Professional legal correspondence

• Escalation when airlines refuse

Our focus is monetary compensation, not vouchers or loyalty points.

What Types of Flights Can Still Be Compensated?

Many passengers wrongly believe compensation only applies in the EU.

In reality, compensation may apply to:

• Flights departing outside the EU

• Non-European airlines

• Long-haul intercontinental routes

• Missed connections outside Europe

• Flights with multiple airlines under one booking

Time Limits: How Far Back Can You Claim?

Depending on jurisdiction, claims may be filed 2 to 6 years after the flight.

Airlines rarely disclose this.

Final Thought: The Right Law Makes All the Difference

Flight compensation is not about luck — it’s about applying the correct regulation.

Airlines profit from passenger uncertainty.
MySkyHelp exists to correct that imbalance.